Support

Deliberately, and it is the hardest thing to explain about the app. SRT, KTMB, the Laos–China Railway, Vietnam Railways and KAI publish nothing in a common format, and several of them change a timetable without announcing it. A departure time carried inside an app is a remembered time, and a remembered time is the fastest way to miss a train.

What you get instead is the thing that actually decides whether a plan survives: how often each service runs. A missed connection on a train that goes eight times a day costs an hour. On one that runs twice a week it costs three days. Take the legs to the operator's own booking page — linked on each one — and read the real clock there.

Please tell me. This is a hand-built network and the corrections that arrive from people who have just made the journey are worth more than anything I can check from a desk.

The most useful report says which two stations, what the app claimed, what you found, and roughly when you were there. A photograph of a departure board or a ticket settles almost anything. doug@mukbangshow.ae.

The network was last reviewed 2026-07, and the app shows that date at the foot of every itinerary rather than hiding it.

Every leg also carries how much it should be trusted. Structural means a physical or administrative fact — where a station is, which gauge, who stamps passports where — and those are stable for years. Reported means it agrees across the operator's own pages and the usual reliable sources. Verify means volatile or known to suspend, and those are the ones to confirm before you build a plan around them.

Entirely. The network, the map, the routing and every border briefing are inside the app; nothing is fetched while you use it. It works in flight mode at a frontier post, which is the situation it was built for.

The only things that need a connection are the outbound links — an operator's booking page, or a location in a maps app — and those open in your browser rather than in the app.

No, and it will not try to. Each leg links to whoever actually sells that ticket, which is usually the operator's own site. Where an operator genuinely cannot be booked from abroad, an aggregator is offered instead — and it is labelled as one.

They are indicative, and the app says so on every itinerary. Fares in the region move with fuel, season and class, and several operators price the same seat differently depending on where you buy it. Use the totals to compare one journey against another and against a flight; use the operator's site for what you will actually pay.

That is an answer rather than a failure. Myanmar has no through rail to Thailand. Vietnam's network touches no neighbour's. Indonesia is reachable only by sea. When the honest answer is that a journey cannot be made overland, the app says so and tells you where the gap is, instead of inventing a leg to fill it.

Correct, in two ways. The app leaves out the photographs, because the library is most of the download and the drawn artwork is the same artwork the site falls back to anyway. And it leaves out the links to the written-up route pages, which are separate documents on the website and would be dead ends inside a single bundled file. Every itinerary the two produce is the same itinerary — it is the same program.